Ellasie Review Standards

Medical Review Policy

Every piece of health and wellness content published on Ellasie is reviewed by a qualified medical professional before it goes live. This page explains exactly what that process involves, who carries it out, what it covers and what it does not, and how it fits into the wider editorial and quality standards that shape everything we publish.

We created this policy because wellness is a space where trust matters more than volume. Readers searching for information about vaginal microbiome support, menopause wellness, or how probiotics work deserve content that has been checked by someone with clinical training — not just written by a content team and published on the same day.

This is not a legal disclaimer. It is a transparent account of how we hold ourselves to a higher standard, and why that standard exists.

Last reviewed: April 2026 For general information only

What "medically reviewed" means at Ellasie

When you see "medically reviewed" on an Ellasie page, it means a named, qualified healthcare professional has read the content and assessed whether the health-related claims, explanations, and recommendations are accurate, appropriately sourced, and safe for a general wellness audience.

It does not mean the reviewer wrote the content. It does not mean every sentence has been individually verified against a clinical database. And it does not mean the page constitutes medical advice. What it does mean is that a real clinician — with a real degree, real clinical experience, and a real name attached to their review — has confirmed that the content meets a responsible standard of accuracy before publication.

Why this matters for wellness content

The wellness supplement space is full of content that sounds authoritative but has never been checked by anyone with clinical training. Pages make claims about gut health, hormonal balance, or vaginal microbiome support without citing sources, without naming reviewers, and without explaining how the information was verified.

We take a different approach. Our review process exists because the topics we cover — intimate flora and pH balance, bacterial vaginosis symptoms, menopause vitamin support — are health topics. They deserve the same editorial care you would expect from a health publisher, not just a supplement brand.

This policy works alongside our Editorial Policy, our Testing and Quality standards, our How We Choose Ingredients page, and the broader educational resources collected in our Science Library.

If you are pregnant, breastfeeding, taking medication, have a medical condition, or are under medical supervision, speak to a qualified healthcare professional before using supplements. Our content is intended to support your understanding — not to replace clinical guidance.

Our review process, step by step

Medical review at Ellasie is not a rubber stamp. It is built into our content workflow as a distinct stage with clear responsibilities. Here is how it works.

Content drafting and editorial review

All content is drafted by our editorial team following the standards set out in the Ellasie Editorial Policy. This includes sourcing from peer-reviewed research, using accurate terminology, and framing all claims within the boundaries of general wellness education — not diagnosis or treatment.

The editorial team completes a first review for clarity, accuracy of sourcing, and compliance with UK advertising standards for supplement content before the draft is passed to a medical reviewer.

Medical reviewer assignment

A member of the Ellasie Medical Board is assigned to review the content. Assignment is based on the topic area and the reviewer's clinical expertise. Content about vaginal probiotics or intimate health, for example, would typically be reviewed by a board member with relevant gynaecological, microbiological, or pharmaceutical background.

Clinical accuracy check

The assigned reviewer reads the full content and assesses it against several criteria:

  • Are health-related claims accurate and supported by current evidence?
  • Are sources cited appropriately, reflecting peer-reviewed or widely accepted clinical guidance?
  • Is the language proportionate — does it avoid overstating benefits, implying treatment or cure, or making claims beyond what the cited research supports?
  • Are safety considerations, contraindications, or "speak to your doctor" qualifications included where appropriate?
  • Is the content suitable for a general audience without clinical supervision?

Feedback and revision

If the reviewer identifies inaccuracies, unsupported claims, or language that oversteps responsible wellness framing, the content is returned to the editorial team with specific notes. The editorial team revises the content and resubmits it for a second review if the changes are substantial.

Minor corrections — a phrasing adjustment, a missing qualifier, a source that needs updating — are resolved in a single round. Larger issues, such as a claim that is not adequately supported, may require restructuring the section or removing it entirely.

Approval and publication

Once the reviewer confirms that the content meets the required standard, the page is approved for publication. The reviewer's name and credentials are displayed on the published page, alongside the review date. This attribution is not cosmetic — it is a commitment to accountability.

Periodic re-review

Published content is not permanent. Pages covering health topics are flagged for periodic re-review, particularly when new research is published in a relevant area or when regulatory guidance changes. Re-review follows the same process as initial review, and the review date on the page is updated accordingly.

Who reviews our content

Our medical reviewers are members of the Ellasie Medical Board — a small advisory panel of healthcare professionals with clinical qualifications and subject-matter expertise relevant to women's health, microbiology, nutrition, and general practice.

Each board member has a full profile page on our site where you can see their qualifications, clinical background, and professional credentials. We do this because anonymous review is not review — it is a gesture. Naming the people behind the process is part of what makes it meaningful.

Reviewers are compensated for their professional time. Compensation is for the review work itself and is not based on product sales or on a predetermined review outcome.

Scope and limitations of medical review

We want this part to be clear. Medical review only matters if the boundaries are explained honestly.

What medical review covers

What medical review does not cover

  • Marketing copy, promotional campaigns, social media content, or advertising creative
  • Pricing, shipping, or customer service information
  • User-generated content such as customer reviews
  • Third-party content hosted on platforms outside Ellasie, including marketplace listings
  • General brand pages that do not make health claims

What medical review does not replace

Medical review strengthens content quality, but it is one part of a broader trust system. It does not replace:

  • Professional medical advice from your GP or specialist
  • Independent product testing and quality assurance — covered separately in Testing and Quality
  • Regulatory compliance with UK ASA CAP Code requirements for supplement advertising
  • The editorial standards that govern how content is researched and written — see the Editorial Policy

What this means for you

If you are reading an Ellasie blog article, educational page, or product page and you see a "medically reviewed" label, you can be confident in the following.

A named clinician checked it

The content was assessed by a specific, identified medical professional — not an anonymous freelancer or automated compliance tool. You can see their name, read their profile, and verify their credentials.

Claims are evidence-based

Health-related claims have been checked against peer-reviewed research or widely accepted clinical guidance. If a claim could not be substantiated, it was revised or removed before publication.

Language is proportionate

The reviewer checked that the content does not overstate benefits, imply treatment or cure, or make promises that the cited evidence does not support. Wellness education should inform — not alarm or oversell.

Safety qualifications are included

Where relevant, the content includes appropriate qualifications — such as when to consult a doctor, who should avoid certain supplements, and what the limits of self-care are for a given topic.

None of this means Ellasie content is a substitute for speaking with your own healthcare provider. What it means is that the information has been through a process designed to make it more reliable, more accurate, and more responsible than content that has not been reviewed at all.

How reviewed content connects to the rest of Ellasie

Medical review does not exist in isolation. It is part of a connected trust system that spans our editorial process, ingredient selection, product testing, and educational content. Here is how the pieces fit together.

Trust and standards

The policies and processes behind Ellasie content and products.

Science and education

The educational depth that our reviewed content draws on and links to.

Products supported by reviewed content

Health-related claims on the following product pages fall within the scope of our medical review process.

Corrections, updates, and content feedback

We take content accuracy seriously, and we know that standards must be maintained — not just set. If you spot something in our content that you believe is inaccurate, outdated, or misleading, we want to hear about it.

You can contact us through the Ellasie contact page. Include the URL of the page in question and a brief description of the issue. All content-related feedback is reviewed by the editorial team, and where necessary, escalated to a medical reviewer for reassessment.

When a published page is updated following a correction or re-review, the review date on the page is updated to reflect the change. We do not silently revise content. Transparency is not optional — it is how trust works.

If your question relates to your personal health, symptoms, medication, pregnancy, breastfeeding, or a medical condition, please contact a qualified healthcare professional directly.

Frequently asked questions

These answers are here to make the label easier to understand and to avoid the vague wording that trust pages often hide behind.

What does "medically reviewed" mean on Ellasie?
It means a named, qualified healthcare professional has read the content, assessed the accuracy of health-related claims, checked the sources, and confirmed the content is suitable for a general wellness audience. The reviewer's name, credentials, and review date are displayed on the published page.
Who are the medical reviewers?
Our reviewers are members of the Ellasie Medical Board. Current members include Dr Ioannis Nikitidis, Dr Nurten Abaci Kaplan, and Dr Rida Asghar. Each has a full profile page where you can review their qualifications and background.
Does the medical reviewer write the content?
No. Content is written by the editorial team and reviewed by a medical professional as a separate step. The reviewer assesses accuracy and safety — they do not draft the content. Our content creation process is outlined in the Editorial Policy.
Is Ellasie content a substitute for medical advice?
No. Our content is educational and intended to support your understanding of wellness topics. It is not a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. If you have a health concern, please consult your GP or a qualified healthcare provider.
What types of content are medically reviewed?
Medical review applies to blog articles in the Women's Wellness Guides, educational and science pages, and health-related claims on product pages. It does not apply to marketing copy, social media posts, user reviews, or third-party content.
Does a medically reviewed page mean a product is guaranteed to work?
No. Review helps us communicate more responsibly, but it does not guarantee that a product will be suitable or effective for every individual. Supplements affect people differently depending on their health, diet, and circumstances.
How often is reviewed content updated?
Published content is flagged for periodic re-review, particularly when new research is published or regulatory guidance changes. When a page is re-reviewed, the review date displayed on the page is updated. Corrections submitted by readers are also reviewed and acted on where appropriate.
Can I report an error in Ellasie content?
Yes. Please use the contact page and include the URL of the page and a brief description of the issue. All feedback is reviewed by the editorial team, and clinical queries are escalated to a medical reviewer.
How does medical review relate to product testing?
Medical review covers the accuracy of health-related content. Product testing and quality assurance are separate processes covered in Testing and Quality. Both contribute to the overall trust system but operate independently.
What happens if a reviewer flags a problem with content?
The content is returned to the editorial team with specific feedback. The editorial team revises the content and, if the changes are substantial, resubmits it for a second review before publication. Unsupported claims are revised or removed — they are not left in place with a softer qualifier.
Are reviewers paid by Ellasie?
Reviewers are compensated for their professional time. Compensation is for the review work itself and is not based on product sales or on a predetermined review outcome. We disclose this because transparency about the relationship matters.
Does Ellasie follow any specific editorial or advertising standards?
Yes. All content is produced in line with the Editorial Policy, which includes compliance with UK ASA CAP Code requirements for supplement content. Medical review adds a clinical accuracy layer on top of these editorial and regulatory standards.
Where can I learn more about Ellasie's trust and quality standards?
Start with the Science Library, which acts as a central hub linking to all trust, education, and quality pages. From there you can access the Editorial Policy, Testing and Quality, How We Choose Ingredients, and the Medical Board.